Skip to content

Gaming The Hall of Fame

7 January 2010

Cross-posted at Rotosynthesis

Tony LaRussa is in the news today, saying his “dream” is to see new Cardinals hitting instructor Mark McGwire pinch-hit in a game this season.

Never one to miss a trick, Rob Neyer pounces on the deeper meaning of LaRussa’s pie-in-the-sky gesture. As things stand, McGwire has little to no support for getting inducted into the Hall of Fame. The big obstacle, of course is baseball backlash’s against performance-enhancing drugs, and McGwire’s status as a poster child for the PED era. As Rob explains, if McGwire gets into a game this season, his Hall of Fame eligibility clock is temporarily stopped, and he doesn’t go back on the ballot until 2016. By pushing the timeline back five years, McGwire could benefit from a more accepting attitude among voters, as the BBWAA welcomes in new blood and PEDs in general potentially lose some of their stigma.

I would LOVE for this to happen.

First off, I think voters should elect Hall of Famers primarily for their accomplishments on the field. Players like McGwire, Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez and Manny Ramirez all possess overwhelmingly good numbers – so vote ’em in. If we start disqualifying players for taking advantage of the loopholes of a given era, you can toss everyone out of the Hall of Fame. Players of Willie Mays’ era dipped into giant bowls of greenies, proudly displayed in every clubhouse. Players of Babe Ruth’s era played against white players, and not even the best white players; with no scouting and no farm systems around, happenstance was many players’ ticket to the big leagues, and many big potential talents probably never got a shot because they were never discovered. If LaRussa’s gambit helps McGwire get in the Hall of Fame, great. McGwire’s a big part of baseball history, and should be acknowledged as such.

But there’s another reason I’m for LaRussa’s idea. There are many enlightened, thoughtful people in the BBWAA, people who take their jobs seriously, and put a great deal of effort into selecting players for induction. But there are also some voters who game the system, whose cognitive dissonance and egos drive them to make up arbitrary rules about who should and should not get in based on their own whims. Forget PED-linked players for a second. We see players fall short because some voters don’t find it proper to vote in anyone but Hank Aaron on the first ballot. Other voters decide they’re moral watchdogs, so they’re going to make one of the greatest second basemen of all-time wait, because he once did something rude and insulting to an umpire on TV. I especially enjoyed the story told by @SportsByBrooks on Twitter today, noting that one BBWAA member wouldn’t vote for Bert Blyleven this year because he wanted to stick it to the ex-pitcher for lobbying on his own behalf. There’s nothing in the rules against gaming the voting system, so they’re going to do it.

Splendid. So Tony, go ahead and use Mac in some meaningless September game this season, and extend his Hall of Fame clock by five years. It might result in voters’ attitudes toward McGwire improving in time for his election — or it might be viewed as a stunt and actually backfire. But it would certainly send a message about power and responsibility, that if one faction wants to bend the rules to their advantage, another faction can do the same. In fact, Tony, don’t just send Mark McGwire up to pinch-hit for his one plate appearance of the 2010 season.

Have him bunt.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. dldojan permalink
    8 January 2010 11:42 am

    “In fact, Tony, don’t just send Mark McGwire up to pinch-hit for his one plate appearance of the 2010 season. Have him bunt.”

    That is just beautiful…

    And I completely agree with everything you wrote. If McGwire’s clock stops for 5 years, maybe some of these older “mightier than thou” voters won’t be voting anymore. And I’m by no means a McGwire fan (though I respect him as a player) – I just think all this PED talk is complete BS.

  2. 8 January 2010 3:02 pm

    Totally agree about the ego-bloated BBWAA voters who have tried to invent themselves as America’s moral compass. It’s the Hall of Fame, not the “Hall of Nice Guys who Played the Right Way, Except for Ty Cobb”

  3. 9 January 2010 11:44 am

    JonahKeri apparently believes that any BBWAA voters who disagree with him are abusing their privileges. Well, that’s what HOF voting is all about. You don’t need unanimity, but you do need 75%. My personal opinion is that any players with seriously suspect statistics should be kept out of the Hall, if for no other reason than to preserve some legitimacy to MLB’s singular asset: its ability to compare the records of players from different eras. (Yes, I know MLB used to be segregated, but that wasn’t due to individual players’ personal actions. Besides, we already have a mechanism for recognizing the accomplishments of Negro League players.)

    As for the politically correct comments regarding “mightier than thou” attitudes, please stop the whining, grow up and get your own house in order.


  1. The Dord of Darien

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers

%d bloggers like this: